// about
We're building the reviewer we wanted.
ReviewIQ started from a simple frustration: every AI review tool we tried read one file at a time, and every bug that hurt us lived between files.
Code review is where quality is decided, and it's the part of engineering that scales worst. Reviewers are tired, context is expensive, and the change that breaks production usually looked fine in isolation.
ReviewIQ reviews every pull request with cross-file awareness — following a value as it moves between modules — and pairs that with eight security and quality analyzers, merge gates, and ticket compliance. One platform, working on the pull request, on whichever git host your team already uses.
What we believe
- Reviews should read the codebase, not a file
- The bugs that reach production are rarely visible in one file. They live in the seam between three. That is the problem worth solving.
- Sold where the code actually lives
- Plenty of tools treat GitHub as the only platform that exists. Bitbucket and Azure DevOps teams deserve a first-class reviewer, not a downgrade.
- Say only what the product does
- Our pricing page lists features the engine actually delivers today. Anything on the roadmap is labelled as roadmap. You should never discover a gap after you pay.
- Noise is a bug
- A reviewer that comments on everything gets muted. Every line in a ReviewIQ review has to earn its place.